Persuasive Speech Essay Sample free essay sample

 ·Specific Purpose Statement: Today I will trust to carry you why I feel the Euthanizing of animate beings can be incorrect.  ·Central Idea: Today I will trust to carry you in why I feel euthanasia is incorrect. I will state you about the advantages of mercy killing. following I will state you about the fortunes in which I am against mercy killing and solutions to how I feel we can assist euthanasia rates bead.  ·Organizational Structure Used: Topical Order  ·Visual Aids Used: ImagesIntroductionI. ATTENTION GETTER: Harmonizing to the online Merriam Webster Medical Dictionary. â€Å"Euthanasia: the act or pattern of killing hopelessly ill or injured persons ( as individuals or domestic animate beings ) in a comparatively painless manner for grounds of clemency. † II. SPECIFIC PURPOSE/TOPIC REVEALED: Today I will trust to carry you why I feel the euthanizing of animate beings can be a bad thought. III. CREDIBILITY/BACKGROUND INFO/RELEVANCE TO AUDIENCE: As a individual who has volunteered in animate being shelters during the summer for the past two old ages I feel am able to talk about why mercy killing is non a good thought. We will write a custom essay sample on Persuasive Speech Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page IV. CENTRAL IDEA ( THESIS ) /OVERVIEW OF MAIN POINTS: Today I will trust to carry you in why I feel euthanasia is incorrect. I will state you about the advantages of mercy killing. following I will state you about the fortunes in which I am against mercy killing and solutions to how I feel we can assist euthanasia rates bead. Passage: I will foremost get down by speaking about the advantages of euthanizing animate beings. BODY I. First Chief Point: There are some advantages to the euthanizing of animate beings. A. Subpoint/Supporting Material: One of the advantages of seting animate beings to kip is when an animate being is ill and can non be cured. 1. Sub-Subpoint- When an animate being can non be cured due to wellness jobs the animate being is so put to kip. a. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- In an article â€Å"Why We Euthanize† by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals ( PETA ) . show images of some animate beings who have wellness jobs that can do hurting and agony. b. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- One of these images is of a cat named â€Å"Diamond. † who â€Å"was enduring from a painful facial tumour that was easy eating off at his face. † ( PETA ) c. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- Although I do non hold with the euthanizing of animate beings I do experience that animate beings should be put to kip if an animate being has a wellness job that can non be cured. 2. Sub-Subpoint- Another advantage of mercy killing is in carnal testing. a. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- When animate beings are used for research many are hurt from the side of effects. b. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- In an article by Dana Bidnall titled â€Å"Animal Testing† she states that â€Å"a big sum of lab animate beings suffer isolation. ennui. anxiousness. psychological hurt. separation from their female parents shortly after birth. and wakefulness. These uncomfortablenesss are in add-on to the physical hurting the animate beings endure during public presentation of the experiments. † ( Bidnall 50 ) c. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- Due to the animate beings hurting and agony animate beings should be euthanized to avoid this hurting. B. Subpoint- Animal maltreatment is another ground why utilizing mercy killing is a good thought. 1. Sub-Subpoint- In the article â€Å"Noted NY carnal hospice hit with inhuman treatment charges. † by Mary Esch states that â€Å"People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals said the probe found paralytic Canis familiariss dragging themselves around until they developed bloody tegument ulcers while their wheeled carts hung on a fencing fresh ; animate beings kept in nappies for several yearss. doing urine scald ; animate beings with unfastened lesions and respiratory infections that weren’t taken to a veterinarian. † a. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- This carnal hospice is meant to be used as a topogr aphic point for exigency attention for animate beings. yet animate beings are being abused. b. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- These animate beings who are non being taken attention the manner they should necessitate to be taken out of their wretchedness because they are in hurting and agony. Passage: Now that I have told you some of the advantages of euthanizing. I will now state you about the fortunes in which mercy killing is incorrect II. Second Main Point- There are different grounds to why the euthanizing of pets can be incorrect. A. Sub-Point- One of the grounds is the euthanization of animate beings because of overpopulation. 1. Sub-Subpoint- Harmonizing to an article by Animal Welfare on favored population done in 2011 it stated that â€Å"it is estimated that between 6 to 8 million American pets are euthanized each twelvemonth as a desperate and heartbreaking agencies by underfunded and under staffed organisations as a method of population control. This translates to 16. 438 to 21. 917 pets euthanized each twenty-four hours! † a. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- This shows that in the U. S entirely. there are 1000000s of animate beings come ining shelters and a great figure of them are being euthanized as a consequence of this. b. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- Animal Welfare besides states that â€Å"the bulk of these animate beings were immature. healthy. adoptable. and at least 25 % per centum of them were purebreds† c. Sub- Sub-Subpoint- These animate beings that are put to kip. are non merely animate beings who have been hurt in any manner but are besides animate beings who are able to adopted in to new places. 2. Sub-Subpoint- Another ground why people euthanize animate beings is because of behavior issues. a. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- In an article named â€Å"Euthanasia pros and cons† by Steady Health it states that â€Å"some people decide to set their pet to kip due to the fact that it has changed its behaviour negatively. going unm anageable. unpredictable or unsafe. † b. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- I feel that proprietors who have euthanized animate beings because of behavior issues could hold prevented these jobs by having instruction on these issues and dog preparation ; animate beings should non be to fault for the errors people make. c. Sub- Sub-Subpoint- In a newspaper article by Jeff Hampton in the Virginian-Pilot he writes about a how a â€Å"10 month old male child was killed because of the household dog† ( pittbul mix ) . † the Canis familiaris who was euthanized for this. on another juncture the Canis familiaris had bitten the older kid. d. Sub- Sub-Subpoint- This could hold been prevented if the household would hold sought out to happen ways to decide Canis familiariss behavior jobs with preparation ; the household would hold their boy and their Canis familiaris. B. Subpoint- There is besides the issue that an animate being can be euthanized when it belongs to person else. 1. Sub-Subpoint- An illustration of this is seen in the article â€Å"Who’s animate being is it? † by Cherie Travis she writes about how in a instance â€Å"a adult male comes into your municipal shelter with a Canis familiaris he says is his. He says the Canis familiaris spot him and petitions that your insta llation euthanize the Canis familiaris. † ( pg. 48 ) â€Å"municipal shelter euthanized the Canis familiaris subsequently that afternoon. That eventide. a adult female came in with cogent evidence that she owned the Canis familiaris and was devastated to larn that the Canis familiaris had been killed as a consequence of her angry ex-boyfriend conveying the Canis familiaris to the shelter and lying to staff. † ( pg. 48 ) a. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- This occurs when a individual presents an animate being for resignation to a shelter or deliverance and finds out subsequently that this individual did non hold legal authorization to give up the animate being. b. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- Another illustration that shows this is seen in the article â€Å"When We Kill Our Pets† by Jessica Pierce ; she writes about a military Canis familiaris named â€Å"Target† who was adopted by a soldier ; â€Å"Target† later escaped her place and was picked up by animate being control and taken to a shelter she had no neckband and on Friday images of â€Å"Target† were put on the shelters website. on Monday the proprietor went to the shelter to happen her. he found that she was put to kip. 2. Sub-Subpoint- Pierce states that â€Å"the shelter worker in charge of euthanizing animate beings that twenty-four hours had seemingly picked the incorrect Canis familiaris out of the pen. † ( Pierce 1 ) a. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- Due to this an guiltless animate being was euthanized. b. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- If the euthanizing did non happen in shelters this could hold been prevented. Passage: I have now told you about the fortunes in which mercy killing is incorrect and will now state you about ways we can assist in lower mercy killing rates. III. Third Main Point- There is different ways in which we can assist in dropping euthanasia rates. A. Subpoint- One of these ways is by looking into what type of Canis familiaris is good for you. 1. Sub-Subpoint- A individual who is non active does non desire to buy a Canis familiaris that is really active. a. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- From experience when I was younger I owned a Siberian Eskimo dog. ( Sparky ) he was really active and loved to delve. whenever I would come place from school I would come place to hear that my ma had to trail Sparky down the street because he had jumped the fencing. b. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- This occurred at least twice a hebdomad. and was resolved when my parents built a higher fencing. c. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- This showed there are different types of Canis familiariss that are suited for every individual. 2 . Sub-Subpoint- Another manner we can assist maintain mercy killing rates down is by buying animate beings from the shelter alternatively of buying from neighbours and pet shops. a. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- There are a high figure of pets in shelters that are healthy and adoptable. b. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- Animals in shelters want to populate in places where they can be loved and cared for non euthanized. B. Subpoint- Another manner to maintain mercy killing rates down is by altering and altering pets. 1. Sub-Subpoint- When you purchase a pet you can forestall litters by altering or altering your pet. a. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- Many organisations can alter and alter you pets for a low monetary value or nil at all. b. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- An organisation that does this is the Amanda Foundation ; this organisation spays and neuters your pets for free. c. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- This helps in diminishing the favored population and decreases the figure animate beings to be taken into the shelter. 2. Sub-Subpoint- Adding a micro chip and licence is another manner to cut down mercy killing. a. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- By adding a micro chip and licence to your pet allows for your pet to be returned to you encase animate being is lost. b. Sub-Sub-Subpoint- This helps in calculating out who the carnal belongs to and allows the animate beings to be return to their right full proprietor if found. alternatively of handling it as a stray. Passage: There you have it- I have now told you about the manner we can assist diminish the mercy killing rates. Decision I. RESTATEMENT OF SPECIFIC PURPOSE: I hope I have been able to carry you in why I feel the Euthanizing of animate beings can be incorrect. II. RESTATEMENT OF CENTRAL IDEA ( THESIS ) /MAIN Points: Now that I told you about the advantages of mercy killing. fortunes in which I am against of mercy killing and solutions to how I feel we can assist euthanasia rates drop. I hope I was able persuade you in why I feel euthanasia is incorrect. III. CONCLUDING Remark: I hope that before buying your first and following pet you educate yourself on the pet you hope to buy to avoid acquiring him or her euthanized. Plants Cited Article in a Reference Work â€Å"Euthanasia. † Merriam Webster. Merriam Webster Online.Merriam Webster Inc. . 2012. Web. 26 Nov. 2012hypertext transfer protocol: //www. merriam-webster. com/medical/euthanasiaNewspaper ArticleJeff Hampton. â€Å"Dog that killed N. C. male child euthanized ; charges possible. † The Virginia-Pilot. September 15. 2012. Web. 26 Nov. 2012. hypertext transfer protocol: //hamptonroads. com/2012/09/dog-killed-nc-boy-euthanized-charges-possible Online Scholarly Project or Reference Database Bidnall. Dana. â€Å"Animal Testing. † Alive: Canada’s Natural Health A ; Wellness Magazine 299 ( 2007 ) : 48-51. Consumer Health Complete – EBSCOhost. Web. 1 Dec. 2012. ESCH. Mary. â€Å"Associated Press. Noted NY Animal Hospice Hit with Cruelty Charges. † AP Top News Package ( 2012 ) : Newspaper Source Plus. Web. 3Dec. 2012 Pierce. Jessica. â€Å"When We Kill Our Pets. † Chronicle of Higher Education 59. 3 ( 2012 ) : 2. Academic Search Complete. Web. 24 Nov. 2012 Travis. Cherie. â€Å"Whose Animal Is It? . † Animal Sheltering ( 2010 ) : 47. Vocational Studies Complete. Web. 21 Nov. 2012. Web sites â€Å"Euthanasia pros and cons in animate beings. † Steady Health: March 11. 2012. Web. 11 Nov. 2012. hypertext transfer protocol: //ic. steadyhealth. com/euthanasia_pros_and_cons_in_animals. hypertext markup language Newkirk. Ingrid. E. â€Å"Why We Euthanize. † Peoples for the Ethical Treatment of Animals: March 3. 2009. Web. 28 Nov. 2012. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. peta. org/b/thepetafiles/archive/2009/03/30/why-we-euthanize. aspx â€Å"Pet Overpopulation. † Animal Welfare: April 4. 2011. Web. 26 Nov. 2012 hypertext transfer protocol: //animalwelfare. areavoices. com/2011/04/04/of-thpet-overpopulation/